Jonathan Kingsbury asked:


http://www.defendingthetruth.com/articles/4808-proposals-change-social-security-benefits.html

During many elections, we have heard proposals from politicians to alter or change Social Security benefits. In this paper, I’m going to research and analyze these proposals to find out whether or not they would be beneficial to the Social Security fund, how it will affect all of us in the future, and the current beneficiaries who receive Social Security.

“The key problem for Social Security is that, as the population ages, soon there will not be enough people paying Social Security taxes to provide benefits for every retired person.” (Dilulio & Wilson 486). This is why so many politicians have proposed changes to the current system. The people in my generation might not see any benefits when it’s our time to retire. “In 1950, there were 16 workers to support every one beneficiary of Social Security; today, there are only 3.3 workers supporting every Social Security beneficiary.” (White House). If Social Security stays unchanged at this rate, Social Security will be paying out more than it takes in. If we ever reach this stage we will be left with two problems, a lot of people paying into the system now will be cut off of Social Security, or the government will borrow more money to pay the beneficiaries, which will increase the national debt.

“Unless otherwise stated, payment levels apply equally to aged, blind, and disabled persons.” (State assistance programs for SSI recipients, 3) I believe that if the Social Security fund only funded beneficiaries who are aged, we would not have such a low number today of 3.3 workers supporting every Social Security beneficiary. “The Budget Enforcement Act, for example, excluded the receipts and disbursements of Social Security from the President’s budget and the congressional budget resolution. Programs that have been excluded like this are called “off-budget”.” (Collender 12)

Robert M. Ball has proposed a plan to alter Social Security while arguing against President Bush’s proposal of private accounts. One thing that Ball has proposed was, “Gradually raise the cap on earnings covered by Social Security so that once again 90 percent of all such earnings would be taxed and counted for benefits” (Ball 2). I believe the means of using tax to fix Social Security will work in the short run, but not in the long. If we do take this approach, should we gradually raise the cap on earnings covered by Social Security even more in the future when Social Security has gone further into debt? Another proposed change by Ball was, “An estate tax is a highly progressive way of meeting this cost, and dedicating it to Social Security would strengthen the contributory.” (Ball 3) Now an estate tax, or sometimes called a “death tax”, is a tax on a person’s estate depending on how much he or she was worth. Again, I see a problem with this proposal because Ball is suggesting that we use another means of tax to be paid into Social Security. I personally think it’s wrong to even have an estate tax because those who are taxed an estate tax were most likely small business owners. “More than 70% of family businesses do not survive the second generation; 87% do not make it to the third generation.” (Frequently Asked Questions about the “Death Tax”)

During the 2000 elections, President Bush was widely known for his proposals to privatize Social Security. Most of the Democrat’s are against Bush’s proposals to change Social Security, whereas, most Republican’s are for Bush’s proposals to change Social Security. In order to find out whether people would be better off under the current Social Security system or a privatized system, I researched the average returns among the current system and compared them to the average returns under a private investment or “private account”.

Barbara Boxer published a “Social Security to Social Insecurity calculator” (Boxer), that calculates the average return an individual will receive under the current system compared to Bush’s privatization plan. I entered many different salaries and years and at every given circumstance, Bush’s plan resulted in a loss. I found this very disturbing considering the large amounts of research I have done last year on retirement accounts.

Dave Ramsey published a ”Privatizing Social Security calculator” (Ramsey), that calculates the return you could expect depending on the type of fund you choose, your income, and your age. Compared to Barbara Boxer’s calculator, I found this calculator more accurate because you were able to choose a fund that had an average annual return, which is calculated into how much you contribute over a given amount of years. The result from Dave Ramsey’s calculator shows how much you will receive from social security and your private accounts when you retire which resulted in a much higher return than social security.

Last year I took an economics class, which covered a great deal in investing for retirement. Some people who are against Bush’s plan of private accounts state that privatizing social security is too risky for retirement. “For individual investors who have neither the time nor the inclusion to actively monitor a stock or a bong portfolio, mutual funds have an obvious appeal. Just pick a good fund and let the managers do the work for you.” (Groz 105). At the age of 19, I visited Fidelity Investments in Braintree, Massachusetts where I was able to start my own investment portfolio. They showed me many funds that ranged from aggressive growth to conservative growth funds. I then chose a couple of mutual funds that were aggressive growth because I was starting my investing at such a young age. “Many investors draw the inference that they should not invest all their money in a single stock or bond, but rather spread out their investments among a group of securities.” (Groz 106). If private accounts were an option, I would recommend people to diversify their investments into many different funds just to limit risk.

Another benefit from investing in certain types of stocks is the dividends. “Dividends, then, are a dividing up and distribution to shareholders of a portion of the corporation’s earnings.” (Groz 27). With these dividends, you can reinvest them into the stock or fund; “Compounding occurs when you get many (e.g., interest or dividends) from an investment and put it back into the portfolio, letting it grow alongside the original investment.” (Groz 183).

After doing researching and analyzing the proposals offered by many politicians, I feel that privatizing Social Security is not such a bad idea. I feel that privatizing Social Security would give people more control of their money when it comes to saving money for retirement that the government cannot touch. I understand that some people might fear the risks of investing in the stock market, but if someone diversifies and chooses funds that are somewhat conservative, there is a very small risk of having little return. Considering that Social Security today has very little return “Social Security’s inflation-adjusted rate of return is only 1.23 percent for an average household of two 30-year-old earners with children in which each parent made just under $26,000 in 1996.” (Beach), you would be better off putting your money into a savings account earning a return close to 3 percent.

“If someone’s definition of national debt excludes the debt owed to federal entities, they are not accounting for the interest on the debt owed to federal entities.” (Ruoco). Since the government’s national debt has been rising year after year which can be seen on (http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisto4.htm), why should I trust the government with my retirement money? This is why I support the idea of privatizing Social Security, or at least giving the American people the option to invest in private accounts.

Sources

Orr, Doug. “Social Security Q & A: separating fact from fiction.” Dollars & Sense 259 (May-June 2005): 15(6).

State assistance programs for SSI recipients. Baltimore, Md. : The Branch, 2002 Jan

Ball, Robert P (2005). “Fixing Social Security” The Century Foundation. 5/3/2005 http://www.socsec.org/facts/Check_Lists/checklist1.PDF

Beach, William W., Gareth E. Davis. “Social Security’s Rate of Return.” The Heritage Foundation. 15 Jan 1998. 25 Nov. 2005 .

Bogle, John C. Common Sense on Mutual Funds : New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor . San Francisco: John Wiley, 1999.

Boxer, Barbara. “Social Security into Social Insecurity.” Social Insecurity. 25 Nov. 2005 .

Brohawn, Dawn K., Norman G. Kurland, and Michael D. Greaney. Capital Homesteading for Every Citizen: A Just Free Market Solution for Saving Social Security. : Center for Economic and Social Justice, 2004.

(Brohawn et al. 256)

Collender, Stanley E. The Guide to the Federal Budget : Fiscal 2000. New York: Century Foundation Press, 1999.

“Frequently Asked Questions about the “Death Tax”.” DeathTax. 29 Mar 2001. The Seattle Times. 25 Nov. 2005 .

Groz, Marc M. Forbes Guide to the Markets : Becoming a Savvy Investor. New York: J. Wiley, 1999.

Hubbard, Glenn. “Happy 70th, Social Security.” Business Week August 08 2005.

Ramsey, Dave. “Making the Case for Privatizing Social Security.” Social Security Reform. 25 Nov. 2005 .

Ruoco, James. “The Impact of Social Security on the National Debt.” JustFacts.com. 1 Sep 2001. 25 Nov. 2005 .

United States. A blueprint for new beginnings : a responsible budget for America’s priorities. Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2001.

United States. “U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt.” Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual. 25 Nov. 2005 .

White House. “Strengthening Social Security for Future Generations.” Strengthening Social Security. The White House. 25 Nov. 2005 .



Caffeinated Content for WordPress

Meghan DiTolla asked:


For a number of years, people have been talking about how the Medicare and Social Security system are potentially not sustainable in its current incarnation.  This will come as dire news to anyone looking to secure Social Security disability payments.  Right now there is a backlog for approvals as well.  In short, the Social Security disability system is not as stable or efficient as it could be.

This is yet another reason to work with a Social Security disability attorney, as a lawyer will be able to navigate this very tough and complicated process and ensure that your future SSD payments are not delayed.  In 2008, the average amount of time to process a Social Security disability application was 480 days.  Now imagine trying to receive benefits without an attorney: if you file information incorrectly, you could be looking at double that amount of time.  Worse yet, it could mean no claim at all, regardless of the amount of time it takes.

The stimulus package could help this scenario, but that is no reason to think you can go it alone.  Though there may be new measures in place to speed up the process, there are still a record number of people filing a SSD claim.  Close to 800,000 people filed a claim in 2008.  The SSD workload is set to increase significantly in the coming years.

The Economic Recovery Bill

The economic recovery bill has a number of provisions that will help the Social Security claim process go more smoothly:

$500 million to help the Social Security Administration process the increasing influx of disability applications. $400 million to improve the computer capability of the SSA – currently utilizing outdated technology. $4.2 million to help people with certain disability receive additional SSI income.

All told, the system should hopefully be better.  Again, it must be stressed that a Social Security attorney is still necessary.  Even if the SSD application process goes more smoothly, it’s still going to mean a long haul for most applications – possibly a year or more.  What this means ultimately is that when you hire a Social Security attorney the process will now go faster, which is very good news.  But you will still need to gather all relevant medical information, accurately dot the “i’s” and follow complicated regulations, so hiring representation is your best avenue towards getting benefits as quickly as possible.

Given the fact that new processes are going to come about via the stimulus package, it is even more necessary to hire an attorney who keeps up with all developments in the Social Security system.  California, in particular, has a large backlog of SSD applicants, given its high population relative to other states.  So while it is very good news measures are being taken to fix a sometimes cumbersome system, you will need an advocate to help you correctly file your application whenever new changes go into effect.  It’s important to remember also that new regulations can occur on a state level as well, in addition to a federal level, so California has particular laws to help SSI applications get processed.



Website content

Eric Bayne asked:


The very first Social Security check was sent through the mail in 1940 even though President Roosevelt had signed the Social Security Act into law, 5 years earlier. Ever since, many American retirees have been grateful to receive that monthly financial safety net as they entered their retirement years. It’s difficult to believe that Social Security has been with us for sixty plus years.

In the original incarnation of the bill, Social Security benefits were only to be paid to the primary worker. But, before the bill went live, additional benefits for the spouse and children were added.

Quite a few folks erroneously think that the Social Security system is equivalent to an investment annuity, in which you send money to the government. They will then invest it and give you the resulting income in monthly payments for the rest of your life. In fact, however, the system is closer to a government welfare program. The collection of payroll taxes , which finances the Social Security program, is managed under the authorization of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, better known as FICA. FICA is like the enforcement arm of the system. It ensures that every worker “contributes” his or her fair share to the government pool.

Each new generation of workers is responsible for taking care of the previous generation’s retirees. The amount of money you eventually get back from the government has only a tenuous relationship to the amount of money that was deducted from your check over the years. Since it’s inception, the system has collected from contributors and paid out over nine trillion dollars to recipients.

But the 1940 statute did not merely quit with allowing retirees to collect benefits. The law also consisted of the first incarnations of the welfare and unemployment systems which are still very much in evidence today.

Today, with millions of people losing their jobs every month, with our financial systems going into the toilet, and the housing crisis exploding around us – these safety nets are becoming more important than ever. Many retired women, especially, are just barely able to make ends meet with the help of Social Security. This is because, although gradually changing, women today are less likely than men to have additional sources of income. Partly due to working less years in the workforce because of child raising responsibilities. And partly because, even while in the work force, women typically are paid less than men.

But all families are helped by Social Security, even those that don’t need it to survive. In fact, according to independent studies, if Social Security was eliminated, many retired families would experience a drop in their living standards of 70% or more.

Many people fear that the system cannot sustain itself. In fact, there have been times in the past when the amount of money paid to recipients exceeded the amount of money collected via FICA. In these cases, Trust bonds were sold to make up the shortfall. Because of circumstances like these, Congress has occasionally upped the percentage of gross income that FICA can collect from salaries. Even these modifications, however, as the population ages and simultaneously live longer, may not be enough to sustain the system without drastic changes to the system.

The Social Security program is the largest government program of the country – constituting over twenty percent of the federal budget. As some politicians look at cutting the size and expenses of government, this program has an inviting target on its back. To many people, however, the cost of losing this critical system could ultimately be much more than the cost of running budget deficits.



Caffeinated Content for WordPress

Trevor Price asked:


The Social Security Number Verification System is a free online tool that allows employers to easily obtain a free Social Security verification for their new employees. Directly from their website, a registered employer can check a potential employee or new hire’s identity and Social Security number.

To learn more about the SSA’s free Social Security verification system, read on.

The Enumeration Verification System Basics for Employers

Employers can register for the Enumeration Verification System by visiting the SSA’s website at ssa.gov/bso/bsowelcome.htm. From this page, the employer must first register for a username and password. Once registered, they can obtain instant results by searching for employee Social Security numbers.

Using E-Verify for All Hiring

E-Verify is the free online tool provided by the Social Security Administration. It allows you, the employer, to conduct a free check of a new employee’s status and Social Security number with both the SSA and the DHS.

Essentially, once a job applicant presents their documents showing both their identity and employment eligibility, an employer has 3 days from the official hiring date to perform an E-Verify check. By using the E-Verify tool, an employer is granted civil and criminal immunity for all the employees it runs through the system in good faith. The legal benefits are massive and it’s a free service.

E-Verify is a fantastic way to establish your company as a responsible employer and one that ensures they are in compliance with all immigration and hiring laws. Remember though, an employer can’t just sit back, relax and assume that simply because a new employee or applicant is cleared on E-Verify, that they’re free from future responsibility. A truly diligent employer should take aggressive steps to insure their workplace is free of Social Security fraud.

Using the Enumeration Verification System if You’re a Lender

Loan companies are also often prey to instances of Social Security number fraud. This system allows lenders to input a loan applicant’s Social Security number and name. After processing the request, they will receive a “no match” or “match” which will show if the Social Security number is correct.

This verification service is run through third-party vendors and is not free. However, it’s a critical tool for verifying identity and preventing fraud.

If you’re searching for free Social Security verification tools, your only option is with the Social Security Administration or through a lender’s vendor. To conduct Social Security number checks, you must be registered with the SSA as an employer and have the proper signed documentation from your new hires.

This can be invaluable information to a hiring organization in validating an employment candidate before bringing him or her on board. And since there is no charge for tapping into the data, it only makes sense to do so, helping to ensure there are no substantial problems with the individual. In fact, the SSA website contains a lot of employer-friendly insights that make it worth perusing through anyway.



Create a video blog

Joseph Kenny asked:


In order to address the routine concerns of many, regarding the payment of bills post-retirement or disability, a federal benefits program was designed in the United States, in 1935, known as the Social Securities Act. The program known as the social security program provides disability, retirement, unemployment and survivor benefits and Medicare. The benefits offered aim at providing financial support to the citizens of the U.S., who fall under the categories specified within the paradigms of the program.

The Social Security Act of 1935 introduced the social security system in the US. The system caters to the financial needs of the retired citizens, who have contributed to the social security trust fund for at least 10 years. It also provides benefits to the survivors, in event of the employee’s death. The other benefits offered cover disability and unemployment.

It is essential for the person to make the regular required contribution to the Social Security Trust Funds through the payroll taxes, to be eligible. By virtue of the provisions of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act or FICA, every worker’s income is subject to a tax payment of 12.4% on the first $94,200 earned during the year. Half of this amount or 6.2% is paid by the employer, while the other 6.2% is deducted from the salary of the employee. The amount is given to the government. Self-employed people are responsible for paying the full 12.4%. This amount is used fund the social security system.

The system has been designed to benefit those who make the necessary contributions for a period of ten years. There is a credit system incorporated in the scheme and you can earn a maximum of four credits per year. This means that irrespective of the higher limit of your actual earnings and consequently the quantum of your contribution to the fund, your earnings would entitle you to receive four credits.

The amount of the monthly social security check that you would receive after retirement would be calculated on the basis of your 35 highest income-generating years. You need to apply, to start receiving you social security benefits. The best time to do this would be a few months before your actual retirement date.

The social security program attempts to pay the retired citizens a pre-determined sum of money, to cover their basic needs. It works as a kind of insurance for the retired people, helping them to cope with financial difficulties, post-retirement.

It is a form of insurance that covers the surviving spouse and children, in case of the employee’s death. If the spouse is between 62 to 65 years, 70 to 99 percent of the benefits are payable. Dependent parents and unmarried children under 18 years are entitled to receive the benefits too.

Disability that prevents employment opportunity is also considered for benefits under the social security system. Physical and mental disabilities are also covered and the payment starts five months after proving the disability to the authorities.

Under the social security system, unemployment benefits are available to those whose unemployment is due to circumstances beyond their control. The program is designed to provide financial relief to the citizens of the U.S. at crucial times.



Create a video blog

Peter Drummond asked:


The Treasury Department, in conjunction with Comerica Bank based in Dallas, has created a social security Direct Express Debit MasterCard as an alternative to paper checks for those persons who do not have bank accounts. The debit card is now available in ten southern states, but is on its way toward the north and western states. Missouri social security lawyers are ready to answer clients’ questions regarding the pros and cons of using this free debit card that will be an option in the coming months. 

The Advantages of the Direct Express Debit MasterCard:

- Will help about 4 million Americans who do not have a bank account, and must receive paper checks.

- Will reduce the vulnerability of check fraud

- Dramatically help the delay of checks mailed in hurricane-ridden states such as Alabama, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi

- No sign-up fees

- No monthly fees

- No overdraft fees

- No credit check is required to enroll

- Gain access to cash via an ATM, bank teller or retailer

- Set up free “low balance” alerts via email or phone 

While the advantages look appealing with all the “freebies” and usability, Missouri social security lawyers remind their clients to read the fine print. The same holds true for SSA’s new debit card because there are still fees associated with the little plastic card that all people should be aware of. Nothing is a “one-for-all” payment plan, so be sure to read the small print at the bottom of the agreement for this debit card, even if you have to use those extra strength reading glasses. 

The Disadvantages of the Direct Express Debit MasterCard:

- ATM fees – users can make one free withdrawal from a network ATM per month; all other ATM withdrawals within the network will cost 90 cents.

- Non-network ATM use will incur the 90 cent fee in addition to the surcharge of the other bank, which can be as much as 3 dollars per cash withdrawal.

- Social security debit cards are costly to use outside the U.S. ATM withdrawals can incur both a bank fee as well as 3 percent of the amount withdrawn. Debit purchases also cost an additional 3 percent of your total amount. Your best bet is to use your one month free withdrawal from a network ATM before you travel abroad or to Mexico or Canada and exchange it for the country’s currency.

- Paper statements cost 75 cents a month. Best option is to receive them via email and print them yourself.

- Online billing from Comerica will also incur a 50 cent per bill charge. Use the merchant’s Website to make payments or purchases online.

- Only 1 free replacement card each year; additional replacements cost $4.00, or $13.50 if you require an overnight delivery. 

Obviously many people have several concerns about the fees and limitations of the SSA’s alternative payment system. Even those folks who have not started receiving social security have voiced their disdain about such a program. While others are simply concerned about the amount of social security they receive or may receive in the future to cover daily living expenses such as heat, electricity, food and medical bills. What happens when their monthly checks run out before the end of the month or they require more money to cover unforeseen medical bills? How will the social security administration help those who need it most? 

If you need further information or have greater concerns with this new system, your Missouri social security lawyers are just a phone call away.



Caffeinated Content for WordPress